Why Texas A&M Must Stop Collecting Union Dues
Texas public universities act as free payment processors for progressive unions, subsidizing a $73 million pipeline for organizations that spend 96 percent of their political dollars on Democrats.
Imagine if a conservative activist organization, say TPUSA, walked into the next Board of Regents meeting with the following demand: they ask the Texas A&M university system to use their taxpayer-funded payroll software, staff, and time to automatically deduct membership fees directly from faculty bank accounts every month, acting as their “free” payment processing system.
The Regents would reject this request immediately. Using public resources to act as a free collection agency for political groups is a clear violation of public trust. Yet, this exact privilege is enjoyed by progressive labor unions and professional associations, like the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) and the Texas State Employees Union all across Texas public universities.
By using the university payroll system to automatically deduct dues from faculty paychecks, taxpayers are footing the bill for these private groups, saving them millions in administrative overhead.
Legal experts argue this practice violates the spirit of the Gift Clause found in the Texas Constitution. The government is forbidden from giving public resources to private entities without a public purpose. When A&M processes these dues, it is effectively donating its administrative power to artificially prop up private political groups.
Political money laundering
This administrative favor funds a massive political machine. According to a 2025 report by the Commonwealth Foundation, 86 percent of the money spent on national politics by the four largest national public sector unions came directly from member dues, rather than voluntary PAC donations.
The partisan split of that spending is undeniable. The report reveals that 95.8 percent of those direct contributions went to Democrats, with just 4.2 percent going to Republicans. By providing a free payroll deduction service, Texas A&M is subsidizing the primary revenue stream for a $650 million progressive war chest.
Funding those who hate us
This is not just a national issue. Texas A&M is actively subsidizing the exact organizations that manufacture political scandals on our own campus. Over the past three years, the AAUP has served as the highly funded defense force for liberal academics and activists working to undermine conservative leadership in College Station.
During the botched hiring of Kathleen McElroy and the suspension of Joy Alonzo in 2023, the AAUP did not just issue press releases. They launched national investigations and formally placed Texas A&M on its “censure” list, aiming to publicly shame the university. Furthermore, when the state legislature passed SB 17 to ban Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) practices, the local AAUP chapter became the central organizing hub for faculty resistance. The university is using its payroll system to collect dues for the AAUP, and the AAUP uses that exact revenue to fight conservative state laws and embarrass the university.
The $73 million shortfall
When states like Arkansas and Florida banned automatic payroll deductions for unions, those organizations saw their revenues plummet by roughly 33 percent almost immediately. Many members simply stopped paying when the money was no longer automatically removed from their checks. The Mackinac Center for Public Policy calls this the “apathy gap.”
If we apply that same 33 percent drop to the Texas pipeline, the true scale of the government subsidy becomes clear. There are roughly 300,000 public sector union members in Texas. At a conservative average of $500 in annual dues, $150 million is currently being routed through government and university payroll systems every year.
If Texas public universities and state agencies stopped acting as free collection agencies, progressive labor organizations would lose approximately $50 million in the very first year. The Texas AFT alone would face an estimated $13 million shortfall.
Time to end the subsidy
During the 2025 legislative session, lawmakers attempted to ban this practice statewide with Senate Bill 2330. The bill passed the Senate but ultimately died in the House, leaving the current permissive laws in place. The Texas Legislature must take this up again in the 2027 session to strip private political organizations of their unearned access to taxpayer payroll systems.
However, Texas A&M does not have to wait for Austin. State law allows this practice, but it does not mandate it. The Texas A&M Board of Regents has the authority to vote tomorrow to stop collecting these dues.
Our university payroll department exists to compensate employees. It should not serve as the collection agency for private associations. If these organizations want to raise money, they should do it on their own dime, with their own software, and on their own time. It is time for the Board of Regents to cut the cord.